CAP Hollywood Update

I am so freaking excited about our movie.

To be honest, I've been excited about it since I wrote my short story. Ever since I started it, I've been able to picture it in my head. When I discussed my story with Ms. Fillman, we talked about how easy it'd be to film, and how good it would look. (We agreed that it would make for great indie, artsy cinematography, which I love). When it was picked to be made into a movie, and our group started discussing filming, it seemed only natural: my story already was a movie, at least inside my head.

Last Saturday, we had our first day of filming. It was one of the most incredible things I've ever seen: the characters in my head, once only imagined, now real and beautiful and emotional, saying the things I wrote for them. My friend Olivia, who was in my Conservatory at Imagination Stage, plays the main character, and Josh, the father of a friend, plays her scene partner. They are both so talented and professional, and it was amazing to work with them. Going back and watching the footage, I can't imagine the scenes any differently. Olivia in particular is fantastic--at one point in the scene, she was actually crying, and we have one beautiful shot of a tear falling down her face. I fully expect her to be at least nominated for Best Actor.

We also got a lot of filming done on Saturday--namely, all of our dialogue and the majority of our script. Tomorrow, we have our second day of filming, and while that'll be a bit of a pain--it requires us to move around a lot, to a bunch of different locations--I'm excited for it, not in the least because it'll be the most fun part to film. It's going to be a montage of cute scenes between Olivia and Everleigh (another actor), and Connor's filming it in a super artsy indie hipster beautiful way.

I'm a little worried about editing, just because we have SO MUCH footage. Luckily, Connor's offered to edit at home in addition to editing at school, so that we can get everything done in time. (Which we will).

We also have great music--we found some good stuff on Creative Commons, but we also emailed an artist that we like and asked if we can use their music. They said yes, so we'll be using 'Big Jet Plane' by Angus and Julia Stone in our film.

Basically, it's gonna be great.

'Murder, Mayhem, and Monkeys...An Evening of David Ives'

So, some of you may recall that last year, I and Sarah Trunk were in a little (actually not so little, actually kinda giant and awesome) thing called the Sarah Play at Roundhouse Theatre. Last year it was 'The Giver,' directed by Jessie Klueter. I played the Chief Elder, and Sarah played Lily. It was the 10th anniversary of the Sarah Play, so it was a huge deal, and lots of exciting things happened as a result of it--there was an article in the Gazette, NPR did a piece on it, and the Sarah Play held its very first student matinee, performed during the school day for students of Loiderman Middle School.

The Sarah Play was created in honor of the memory of Sarah Metzger, an active member of the theatre community in her school and at Round House, who was killed in an automobile accident during her freshman year of college. One of the Round House family’s lasting memories of Sarah is that, while still a high school student, she independently mounted a full-scale theatre production. Wishing to expand on the opportunities offered by her high school’s theatre department, Sarah worked to raise funds, secure facilities and a production staff, market and promote her production, and direct a full-length play. After her passing, Sarah’s family worked with Round House to create The Sarah Metzger Memorial Fund as a tribute to the inspiring young woman. Through the generosity of many contributors, the fund provides the financial resources each season for similarly passionate and motivated high school students to create a fully-realized production with a professional theatre company. Every year, the Sarah Play is directed, designed, stage-managed, and performed by high-schoolers, all of whom are mentored by professionals in their area.

This year, I am once again performing in the Sarah Play, entitled 'Murder, Mayhem, and Monkeys...An Evening of David Ives', and directed by Joan Sergay. It's a collection of one-acts, all by David Ives, and linked together through a theme of technology. The four one-acts are:

'The Philadelphia': a girl is stuck in a state of being called a 'Philadelphia' where she can get anything except what she wants. Hey, we're all got to be somewhere. Performed by Zoe Johnson (Ali), Megan Wirtz (Waitress), and Helen Hanger (Marcy).

'Words, Words, Words': three monkeys in a research lab explore the philosophical idea that monkeys typing into infinity will sooner or later produce Hamlet. Performed by Kenny Hahn (Milton), Everleigh Brenner (Kafka), and Zoe Johnson (Swift).

'Sure Thing': two people, meeting for the first time, have their conversation reset over and over until they get it right. Perfomed by Megan Wirtz (Betty) and Kazz Feliz-Hawver (Bill).

'The Mystery of Twicknam Vicarage': in a classically ridiculous murder mystery, some startling revelations about the relationships between upper-class Brits surface as they try to determine who killed Jeremy Thumpington Fuh-Fuh-Fines. Performed by Everleigh Brenner (Sarah), Kazz Felix-Hawver (Roger), Kenny Hahn (Mona), Helen Hanger (Jeremy), and Zoe Johnson (Inspector Dexter).

The technological theme relates the one-acts through texting, Google searches, and iPhone apps, which connect each one-act to each other and to the audience.

The play opened last Friday night, and, though I say it myself, it was wonderful. The really, really tricky thing about David Ives one-acts is that they are language comedy, and, as Ives' most popular book of plays is entitled, it really is "All in the Timing." As an actor, there have been a lot of challenging aspects of this play--memorizing three one-acts, having three very different characters, going from one character to another quickly, learning how to act like a monkey, developing a Cockney accent--but the most persistent difficulty I and other actors have had with it is getting the timing, rhythm, and energy right. There is a very distinct rhythm to be found in one-acts, and that--combined with the fact that these are comedies (significantly harder than dramas), and language comedies to boot (meaning the audience has to hear and understand everything we say, or else it won't be funny)--makes them supremely difficult to perform. And, although we've been working very hard on this show for three months, and have a terrific fantastic wonderful director, as well as the assistance and guidance of Brianna Letourneau, our acting mentor, and Danisha Crosby, the directing mentor, it's still hard.

On top of that, tech week made me worried. The weekend before the show opened, we had thirteen hours of rehearsal in the black box, just teching the show (putting in lights, sound, etc), and running transitions (quick changes, furniture changes, etc). For most of that time, we were performing at half-energy, as it was a long weekend and we were mostly there to help the designers, anyway. That, combined with all the new elements being integrated, as well as the desire to take our already-done work to a whole new level, made the focus on rhythm intense. Tuesday we had a lot of difficulty, Wednesday we had a great run, Thursday we performed our final dress rehearsal for friends of Roundhouse...and 'Philadelphia' was way too fast, 'Twicknam Vicarage' was too slow. I was scared for Friday. It's a common theatre saying that a bad dress rehearsal makes for a good opening night, but my response to that is always, "What if it doesn't?"

As it turned out, it was a beautiful, beautiful show. The energy was high, the audience was warm, and the fact is, we love theatre, we love performing, and we loved telling this story. Also, the opening night of the Sarah Play is always a really really big deal. As I mentioned above, the reason it's called the Sarah Play is because it's in honor of Sarah Metzger. We are performing in honor of someone's life--someone who, like us, loved theatre. On Thursday, before our final dress, we had a long talk with Brianna and Joan about that: about what a gift it is that we get to do theatre, how the Sarah Play is really about enjoying theatre, and no matter what happens, the fact that we are doing this is special. Because Sarah was special, and theatre is special, and all of us coming together to commemorate that is special. And on the opening night of the Sarah Play, after the show, the Metzgers, Danisha, and various Roundhouse people (including Artistic Director Ryan Rillette, with whom we had an acting workshop earlier this year) speak about Sarah, and the Sarah Play, and what it means to all of us. There were many tears--from the cast, the professionals, and the audience. Everyone cries on opening night. (Incidentally, most of the cast had also cried a lot before the show. Joan had left us each a rose and a note saying how proud of us she was. I knew I would be crying that night anyway--it's an incredibly emotionally charged night--so I took the note and my thoughts to an empty hallway an hour before the show and bawled my eyes out). Before we went onstage, the cast warmed up together, and dedicated the show to Sarah.

Come see the Sarah Play. Really.

March 22nd and 23rd at 8, March 24th at 2. More information at
http://www.roundhousetheatre.org/learn/programs-for-students/the-sarah-play/.

The Taming of the Shrew/The Tamer Tamed

So, for the past two months I've been working on a cool little show called "The Taming of the Shrew/The Tamer Tamed" at Blair. Most people would recognize the first half of the title as a pretty famous play by a pretty famous guy, but the second half is considerably less well-known. "The Tamer Tamed" is a play by 17th-century playwright John Fletcher, who, though he doesn't enjoy the same name-recognition as Shakespeare nowadays, was one of the most influential dramatists of his day. It's a sequel and a counter to the decidedly sexist message of "Taming of the Shrew": in "The Tamer Tamed", Petruchio (the male lead, who 'tames' Kate, the female lead and the 'shrew' of the title) marries again after Kate's death, and is shocked when his new wife, Maria, refuses to obey him, and goes to considerable measures to tame him. Once he is tamed, however, she promises never to rule over him, and the message, stated in the epilogue, is to "teach both sexes due equality."

Which is a pretty great message, yeah? When I auditioned for the play, I'd never heard of "The Tamer Tamed", but now I can't imagine performing "The Taming of the Shrew" without it--partially because it's really fun, really well-written, and generally terrific on its own, but also because the ending of "The Taming of the Shrew" really does make one cringe. Kate's final speech is a sermon of obedience, describing a husband as "thy lord, thy life, thy keeper," and stating that women are bound to "serve, love, and obey." Eeeww. It just doesn't feel right to end like that. Art is, for me, the ultimate portrayal of the human condition. You learn so much about being a person, and, if you are successful in your portrayals, the audience does, too. Ending with an expression of unfeminist values and gender roles makes me feel (or rather, would make me feel) like I had just communicated that I support that, even if just for entertainment. Thinking about it, I'm kind of surprised that people do still perform "The Taming of the Shrew" as it is.

(Incidentally, reading through the 'Controversy' section on the Wikipedia page of "Taming of the Shrew", two interesting arguments pop up: first that Shakespeare is not promoting female submissiveness, but rather arguing against the mistreatment of women by exaggeration. In other words, Shakespeare intentionally makes Petruchio and the other men as cruel and awful as possible so that the audience is repelled by their actions. He investigates misogyny, and comes to the conclusion--as does, presumably, the audience--that it's bad. While this argument is nice to think about, I have difficulty believing it, primarily because Petruchio wins, everyone celebrates, and it is acknowledged to be a comedy because it has a happy ending. If you sympathize with someone, you'll probably sympathize with the person whose burden you most identify with, and for most 16th- and 17th-century men, that would probably be the guy with the crazy wife. I don't think Shakespeare was subtly arguing the opposite of what his play is blatantly stating. The second argument is that the play is neither anti- or pro-women, but rather an more-or-less accurate portrayal of what Shakespeare saw as the relationship between men and women, and while I do think it's almost impossible to give a fictional portrayal of something without adding your own opinion or stance on the issue, I think this is the most likely argument--that Shakespeare wasn't against women (indeed, he has some remarkably strong heroines in other plays), or against women (despite what Kate's final monologue would suggest), but rather was just telling it like it was).

Anyway. "The Taming of the Shrew/The Tamer Tamed" is basically just an incredibly fun show. I play Hortensio, and am wretchedly abused throughout the whole thing--a guitar is broken over my head, I have to eat a lot of food really fast, and a bowl of water is thrown on me. It doesn't really matter if you don't especially like Shakespeare--the show is hilarious and very fast-paced, and, as Ms. O'Connor likes to say, would entertain a five-year-old. Ravyn, Christina, and Conor are also in it. If you haven't already, you should definitely come see it. The four of us are all in the Red Cast (BLOOD!), and our last two performances are Thursday at 3:30 and Saturday at 7:30. If you can't come to either of those, the White Cast is also really good, and is performing on Friday at 7:30 and Saturday at 2. See you there!

Down the Rabbit Hole

Last Tuesday, at 7pm, Blair students (including myself, Ravyn, Natalie, and Conor) presented "Down the Rabbit Hole", a collection of one-act plays directed by Maya Davis and Clare Lefebure. The evening was a rousing success, and lots of fun for both the actors and the audience.

I was in a one-act called "Variations on the Death of Trotsky", which was comprised of eight short scenes on how Trotsky's death might have gone. According to the one-act (and verified by Wikipedia), on August 20, 1940, a Spanish communist named Ramon Mercader smashed a mountain-climber's axe into Trotsky's skull in Coyoacan, a suburb of Mexico City. Trotsky died the next day. The eight scenes showed Trotsky's discovery of the axe in his head (aided by his long-suffering wife) and subsequent acceptance of his death. Since there were eight variations, and each required Trotsky to die at the end, the directors decided to split the stage, and have two Trotskys and two Mrs. Trotskys each do four variations. Variations 1, 3, 5, and 7 were performed by Nick Byron as Trotsky and me as Mrs. Trotsky, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 were performed by Ben Lickerman as Trotsky and Ravyn as Mrs. Trotsky. Conor, as Ramon Mercader, walked between the two couples as needed.

This was my first experience in the one-acts, as well as my first experience on the Blair stage, and it was very enjoyable. I've been seeing Maya and Clare in shows since I was in 5th grade, and I admire them both very much, so it was extremely cool getting to work with them on the one-acts. My next Blair theatre project is "Taming of the Shrew/The Tamer Tamed", for which rehearsals started last Wednesday, and which will be performed at the end of January/beginning of February. I'm playing Hortensio, which is going to be a challenge in several ways. First, I have a fair number of lines, which is both terribly exciting and somewhat frightening, as learning lines--especially Shakespeare--isn't easy. Second, I'm playing a man: I used to play men a lot when I was younger, but haven't played one in about a year and a half, and have certainly never played a man whose characterization mattered this much, and I anticipate the physicality requiring some amount of work on my part. However, since I'm really excited about this show and determined to do well in it, I am choosing to see these challenges as opportunities.

Sorry. Got a little off-track there. More about the one-acts! We had tech for the week prior to the performance, but, following the informality associated with the one-acts, it was not particularly intense. On the one hand, that was pretty nice; on the other, I would've liked to have had a little more preparation with costumes, props, lighting, etc--we didn't get costumes until the day before the show, we got several props the day of, and we didn't rehearse the proper lighting until the actual show. The audience didn't really notice, and it didn't present much of a problem, but it gave me more anxiety than I think was absolutely necessary. I bought knee-high nylons for my costume an hour before the show, practiced flipping open the hand-held makeup mirror with one hand for the first time right before we went on, and did not realize how absolutely pitch-black the audience was until I was actually saying lines out to the audience. It is like looking into a black hole. Also, the Trotskys had never practiced with the "axe-heads" (headbands with plastic knives attached to them, to look like they had weapons in their skulls) or with the classic Trotsky beard and mustache, and both lost their mustaches and axeheads at least once if not several times.

Nevertheless, the one-acts were terrific. Brief overview:

"Bedtime": about two little girls discussing God, "forever", death, and the apocalypse at bedtime. Performed by Mikayla Cleary and Sarah Wilson.

"Laundry and Bourbon": a hilarious and sad one-act featuring a couple of Southern women folding laundry, drinking bourbon, watching TV, and gossiping, in the heat of a summer afternoon. Performed by Natalie Behrends, Mia Massimino, and Anabel Milton.

"Funeral Parlor": an eccentric man comforts a grieving widow at the reception following a funeral. Performed by Peter McNally and Laura Kennedy-Long.

"Ron Bobby Had Too Big a Heart": when prom doesn't go as planned, two girls get revenge. Performed by Emma Bergman and Meg Lebow.

"Variations on the Death of Trotsky": variations...on the death of Trotsky. Performed by Nick Byron, Ben Lickerman, Zoe Johnson, Ravyn Malatesta, and Conor James.

"The Boy Who Ate the Moon": a boy comes to a doctor's office with a rather unusual problem: he has eaten the moon. Performed by Sam Dembling and Calley Mayer-Marks.

"The Philadelphia": a man is stuck in a state of being called a 'Philadelphia' where he can get anything except what he wants. Hey, we're all got to be somewhere. Performed by Aaron Posner, Alex Michell, and Dana Cook.